Assessment Rubric: Annotated Bibliography and Wiki CollaborationThis is a featured page

Mark range: HD (80-100) D (70-79) CR (60-69) P (50-59) F (0-49)

Collaboration (5%)

As a group The group worked well together in finding initial sources that are clearly relevant to the case study assignment for this course. All group members played an active role in discussing who would report on which sources for the annotated bibliography part of the assignment. One or two members of the group took responsibility for contributing sources clearly relevant to the case study assignment for this course. All group members played an active role in discussing who would report on which sources for the annotated bibliography part of the assignment. One or two members of the group took responsibility for contributing sources clearly relevant to the case study assignment for this course. Several group members played an active role in discussing who would report on which sources for the annotated bibliography part of the assignment.

 		One or two members of the group took responsibility for contributing sources clearly relevant to the case study assignment for this course. One or two group members played an active role in discussing who would report on which sources for the annotated bibliography part of the assignment. There is little evidence of the group working together at this stage. There was little or no discussion of who would report on which sources for the annotated bibliography part of the assignment.
As an individual group member The student contributed many valuable sources (10-20) that were clearly relevant to Spolsky’s framework. There is evidence that some ‘pre-screening of sources’ has already taken place to ensure that the sources found will be relevant to the case study. The student contributed many valuable sources (6-10) that were clearly relevant to Spolsky’s framework. There is evidence that some ‘pre-screening of sources’ has already taken place to ensure that the sources found will be relevant to the case study.

 		The student contributed many (6-10) sources pertaining to their given country. These sources may or may not be relevant to Spolsky’s framework. There is still work to be done to determine whether the sources found will actually be of use to the group. The student contributed a few (2-5) sources. These sources may or may not be relevant to Spolsky’s framework. There is still work to be done to determine whether the sources found will actually be of use to the group. The student did not contribute any sources for this assessment task.

Annotated bibliography (10%)

Quality of annotation for ‘academic’ sources: The annotations are well-written, coherent and concise. Full academic references are given using a consistent referencing style. There is clear evidence that the student has read and understood the sources. The student has stated clearly how the sources will be relevant to the case study and Spolsky’s framework. The sources selected to report on address different components of Spolsky’s framework. The annotations are well-written, coherent and concise. Full academic references are given using a consistent referencing style. There is clear evidence that the student has read and understood the sources. The student has stated clearly how the sources will be relevant to the case study and Spolsky’s framework. The sources selected to report on address two components of Spolsky’s framework. The annotations are well-written, coherent and concise. Full academic references are given using a consistent referencing style. There is clear evidence that the student has read and understood the sources. The student has stated clearly how the sources will be relevant to the case study and Spolsky’s framework. The sources selected to report on address one component of Spolsky’s framework.

 The annotations are poorly written and it is not clear from the annotation that the student has read the source and /or understood it fully. Referencing style may not be fully consistent. The student has demonstrated partial familiarity with the Spolsky framework and has shown a limited ability to state how the sources will be relevant. The annotations are poorly written and it is not clear whether the student has read the source and understood it. Referencing style may not be fully consistent. The student does not address Spolsky’s framework in the annotation.
Quality of annotation for ‘non-academic’ sources: The annotations are well-written, coherent and concise. Full reference information has been provided using a consistent referencing style. The student has stated clearly how the sources will be relevant to the case study and Spolsky’s framework. The sources selected to report on address different components of Spolsky’s framework. The annotations are well-written, coherent and concise. Full reference information has been provided using a consistent referencing style. The student has stated clearly how the sources will be relevant to the case study and Spolsky’s framework. The sources selected to report on address two components of Spolsky’s framework. The annotations are well-written, coherent and concise. Full reference information has been provided using a consistent referencing style. The student has stated clearly how the sources will be relevant to the case study and Spolsky’s framework. The sources selected to report on address one component of Spolsky’s framework. The annotations are poorly written and it is not clear from the annotation that the student has understood it fully. Some inconsistencies with reference information. The student has demonstrated partial familiarity with the Spolsky framework and has shown a limited ability to state how the sources will be relevant. The annotations are poorly written and it is not clear whether the student has understood it. The student does not address Spolsky’s framework in the annotation.



jenniferhendriks
jenniferhendriks 		Latest page update: made by jenniferhendriks , Mar 23 2009, 11:27 PM EDT (about this update About This Update jenniferhendriks Edited by jenniferhendriks


- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page

Threads for this page

There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.